Your Social Genome.
Unique as Your DNA.

Datable DNA™ is our proprietary Social Genome framework: the combination of four clinically-validated assessments that together form the most comprehensive relational health profile ever built: your Loveprint, Attachment Style, Conflict-Resolution Style, and Love Language.

It is not a personality quiz or a one-time snapshot. It is a continuously-updated map of your relational biology, built on 60+ years of peer-reviewed science and powered by our proprietary assessment engine.

Four Components. One Social Genome.

Datable DNA™ is composed of four clinically-validated dimensions, each drawn from a distinct body of research. The combination of all four is what makes our Social Genome the most comprehensive relational health profile ever captured , and the core of our proprietary technology.

01🧬

Loveprint

Proprietary Relational Profile

Your foundational relational map , the unique pattern of how you connect, communicate, and heal across all relationships. The Loveprint is the anchor dimension of Datable DNA™, synthesizing your full relational identity into a single living profile.

📚 Datable proprietary assessment framework

02🔗

Attachment Style

Bowlby & Ainsworth Attachment Theory

How you learned to relate to caregivers in early life creates a blueprint for all adult relationships. Your attachment style determines how you respond to intimacy, conflict, and separation , and is directly linked to health outcomes.

📚 Bowlby (1969), Ainsworth (1978), Hazan & Shaver (1987)

03

Conflict-Resolution Style

Gottman Method Research

How you navigate disagreement is one of the strongest predictors of relationship longevity and health. Gottman's 40 years of research identified four distinct conflict styles , and the specific patterns that predict dissolution.

📚 Gottman & Levenson (1992), Gottman Institute Research

04💝

Love Language

Chapman's Five Love Languages

How you give and receive love determines whether your partner's expressions of care actually register as care. Mismatched love languages are one of the most common , and most correctable , sources of relationship dissatisfaction.

📚 Chapman (1992), validated in clinical practice globally

Attachment Theory: The Blueprint for All Relationships

Developed by John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth, Attachment Theory holds that the emotional bonds formed in early childhood create an internal working model for all future relationships. This model is not fixed , but without awareness, it operates automatically.

🔐

Secure Attachment

~~56% of adults

Comfortable with intimacy and interdependence. Able to express needs directly, tolerate conflict without catastrophizing, and return to connection after ruptures.

Key Patterns

Consistent emotional availabilityDirect communication of needsResilience after conflictComfort with both closeness and independence

Health Correlation

Lower cortisol, better cardiovascular outcomes, longer lifespan

Anxious Attachment

~~19% of adults

Hyperactivated attachment system. Preoccupied with relationship security, prone to emotional flooding, and often interprets neutral partner behavior as rejection.

Key Patterns

Fear of abandonmentEmotional hyperreactivityReassurance-seekingDifficulty self-soothing

Health Correlation

Elevated cortisol, higher anxiety disorders, sleep disruption

🛡️

Avoidant Attachment

~~23% of adults

Deactivated attachment system. Learned to suppress emotional needs and maintain self-reliance. Intimacy triggers discomfort; conflict triggers withdrawal.

Key Patterns

Emotional self-sufficiencyDiscomfort with vulnerabilityWithdrawal under stressDifficulty asking for help

Health Correlation

Suppressed immune function, higher cardiovascular risk, loneliness

🌀

Disorganized Attachment

~~2% of adults

Conflicted attachment system, simultaneously desiring and fearing closeness, often associated with unresolved trauma. Partners are experienced as both safe haven and source of fear.

Key Patterns

Approach-avoidance conflictEmotional dysregulationDifficulty with trustTrauma responses in intimacy

Health Correlation

Highest health risk; associated with PTSD, depression, chronic illness

Gottman's Conflict Styles: How You Fight Determines How You Heal

Dr. John Gottman's 40-year longitudinal study of couples identified that it is not whether couples fight, but how they fight , that predicts relationship outcomes. He identified three stable, regulated conflict styles and one dysregulated pattern.

🤝

Validator

Prioritizes emotional validation before problem-solving. Seeks to understand their partner's perspective before asserting their own. Most compatible with other Validators.

Gottman Type: Regulated, low physiological arousal during conflict

Strength: Empathy, de-escalation, emotional attunement

🔥

Volatile

High emotional expressiveness during conflict. Passionate, persuasive, and direct. Conflict is seen as a form of intimacy. High-energy arguments followed by warm reconnection.

Gottman Type: Regulated, high arousal but mutual engagement

Strength: Passion, authenticity, rapid resolution

🌊

Avoider

Minimizes conflict to preserve harmony. Prefers to let issues resolve naturally rather than through direct confrontation. Values autonomy and individual space.

Gottman Type: Regulated, low arousal, conflict-minimizing

Strength: Stability, independence, low-drama environment

⚠️

Hostile

Characterized by criticism, contempt, defensiveness, or stonewalling . Gottman's 'Four Horsemen.' These patterns predict relationship dissolution with 93% accuracy if unaddressed.

Gottman Type: Dysregulated, requires clinical intervention

Strength: High awareness of unmet needs (when channeled constructively)

01

The Four Horsemen

Gottman identified four communication patterns that predict relationship dissolution with 93% accuracy: Criticism (attacking character), Contempt (superiority/disgust), Defensiveness (counter-attacking), and Stonewalling (emotional shutdown). Datable's Jules AI monitors for these patterns in real-time.

📚 40+ years, 3,000+ couples studied

02

The 5:1 Ratio

Stable relationships maintain a 5:1 ratio of positive to negative interactions. During conflict, this ratio drops , but couples who repair quickly maintain relationship health. Datable tracks your ratio and alerts you when it shifts.

📚 Gottman Institute longitudinal studies

03

Bids for Connection

Gottman's research shows that relationships are built or eroded through small 'bids for connection', moments where one partner reaches toward the other. Partners who 'turn toward' bids 86% of the time in stable relationships vs. 33% in relationships that end.

📚 Love Lab, University of Washington

04

Physiological Flooding

When heart rate exceeds 100 bpm during conflict, the prefrontal cortex goes offline, making productive conversation impossible. Datable integrates wearable HRV data to detect flooding in real-time and prompt de-escalation.

📚 Gottman & Levenson, Journal of Family Psychology

Love Languages: Speaking the Same Language as Your Partner

Dr. Gary Chapman's research found that people give and receive love in fundamentally different ways. When partners speak different love languages, genuine expressions of care go unregistered , creating a cycle of unmet needs despite real effort.

💬

Words of Affirmation

Verbal expressions of love, appreciation, and encouragement. Partners feel most loved when told , not just shown.

Example

"I'm so proud of you" or leaving a heartfelt note.

🛠️

Acts of Service

Actions that reduce burden or demonstrate care. Partners feel most loved when their partner does things for them without being asked.

Example

Making coffee, handling a task they've been dreading.

⏱️

Quality Time

Undivided, present attention. Partners feel most loved when their partner is fully engaged , not distracted.

Example

Phone-free dinners, shared activities, deep conversations.

🤲

Physical Touch

Non-sexual physical connection, holding hands, hugs, proximity. Partners feel most loved through physical presence and contact.

Example

A hand on the shoulder, sitting close, a long hug.

🎁

Receiving Gifts

Thoughtful tokens that signal 'I was thinking of you.' Partners feel most loved when partners remember and acknowledge them with tangible symbols.

Example

A small gift that reflects a shared memory or inside joke.

Datable DNA™ Is a Health Predictor

Each dimension of your Datable DNA™ has direct, measurable correlations with physical and mental health outcomes. Insecure attachment elevates cortisol. Dysregulated conflict patterns trigger sustained inflammation. Unmet love language needs create chronic emotional deprivation , which the body registers as stress.

Datable maps your Social Genome continuously, not as a one-time assessment, but as a living profile that evolves as you grow. Jules AI uses it to personalize every insight, intervention, and recommendation to your unique relational biology.

50%

greater survival odds with adequate social relationships

Holt-Lunstad, 2010

93%

accuracy in predicting dissolution from conflict patterns

Gottman, 1992

29%

increased mortality risk from social isolation

Holt-Lunstad, 2015

Sample Datable DNA™ Profile

Loveprint

Connector

Attachment Style

Anxious

Conflict Style

Validator

Love Language

Quality Time

Bio-Social Health Score

74

/ 100 . Good

Powered by your Datable DNA™ , updates daily

Ready to Map Your Social Genome?

Join the waitlist to be among the first to build your Datable DNA™ and receive your Bio-Social Health Score.